Information for authors

HOME

How to publish

SCOPE

ARTICLE TYPES

FORMATTING MANUSCRIPTS

SUBMISSION

EDITORIAL AND REVIEW PIPELINE

AIMS

COSTS (no APC)

ARTICLE TYPES:

Original research: A typical original research article has the standard IMRaD structure of the scientific literature. It will present novel datasets (either collected anew or collated from multiple existing sources) and original analyses thereof. Analyses are expected to be detailed and comprehensive, providing a robust description and interpretation of the dataset, contextualized in existing concepts and theory. They advance the field through presentation of robust hypothesis-based descriptive, experimental, or (meta) analytical research and thus examples that corroborate or question components of existing theory.

Methods: A Methods article describes a purpose and need for a procedural advance, and delivers a tool to achieve that advance. Typically statistical and/or software tools, Methods may also introduce new equipment and novel deployments thereof. A provisional dataset should be included as illustration.

Letter: A Letter article has a modified I(RD)aM structure. It will present original research and analyses, being concise but still detailed and thorough, providing a robust introduction to an emerging phenomenon that has implications for existing concepts and theory. They advance the field through presentation of particularly novel findings or interpretations that corroborate or question aspects of existing theory in a succinct form. 

Opinion/Perspective: A typical opinion/perspective article has a provocative introduction that may take a position on a consequential topic. It develops a framework for interpreting the existing literature, possibly in contrarian ways, and indicates areas for future work that will refute or support the thesis. Articles may address mainstream ideas, or those that have historically been on the fringe or forgotten. A perspective differs from an opinion in having a more moderate rhetorical style, greater integration of evidence, and evaluation of different viewpoints. 

Review: A typical review article has a motivating introduction that encourages readers to continue reading. It develops a general thesis that frames a comprehensive discussion of the existing literature and indicates areas for future work. Reviews in Biogeography often are meta-analyses or other systematic approaches to synthesis of large datasets and/or findings. 

FORMATTING MANUSCRIPTS:

Initial submissions may be in any format as long as they consider the standard sections for modern scientific publications (e.g., IMRaD structure; see also ‘article types’ and ‘brief overview’), including page and line numbering.

Figures and tables may be embedded in the manuscript as best fits the flow of information; key details should be clear. Separate, high resolution, figures will be required after acceptance. 

After first editorial recommendation, manuscripts should be reformatted to journal style, see templates {pending) for guidance. 

Brief overview of requirements

Original research, Methods, and oftentimes Review article types will usually have each of the sections, in order, as listed below.  Letters may re-order the methods section. Opinions and Perspectives will typically have structured arguments that read as an integrated Introduction+Discussion. 

Cover page {Title, Authors, Institutional affiliations, running head, keywords}
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion {optional}
Acknowledgements
References

Other sections:
Author contributions {see CRediT – https://credit.niso.org/}
Conflicts of Interest
Data, code, sample deposition and availability 
Funding sources
Animal welfare {if relevant}

Figures {if not embedded in the main text}
Tables {if not embedded in the main text}

Appendix {optional}
Supplementary documentation {optional}

AIMS:

  • seeking guidance from emerging researchers about their concerns and hopes for publishing”
  • preserving the scholarly integrity of journals by rejecting any direct or indirect interference in editorial and peer review processes, which should depend on the disciplinary expertise and research experience of independent editorial boards 
  • fostering an editorial system that evaluates and protects a rigorous scientific process 
  • supporting access to research by employing processes that increase opportunities for diverse researchers, including promoting equity, early career support, and the inclusion of geographically underrepresented researchers 
  • facilitating training for community members in scholarly writing, as well as on the principles of better publishing to increase accessibility and equity
  • advocating for affordable and equitable publishing options including open access models and initiatives driven by learned societies
  • producing society journal(s) preferentially over journals owned by for-profit publishers.
  • encouraging transparency in relationships and operations
  • Informing journal owners/managers of concerns, best practices, and expectations of the scholarly publishing community

COSTS:

There is no APC. Biogeography is a diamond (a.k.a. platinum) open access scientific journal, which means it is free to both authors and readers. Costs of editing and production are borne through (1) the volunteer service of the editorial board and reviewers, and supported during launch of the journal by (2) grants from the Gates Foundation secured by SUP and PKP and (3) from the Lyrasis Open Access Community Investment Program (OACIP) to FAB.